Skip to main content
arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1706.00933 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2017 (v1), last revised 10 Jul 2019 (this version, v7)]

Title:Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward

Authors:Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto, Richard Torkar, Robert Feldt, Lucas Gren, Carlo A. Furia, Ziwei Huang
View a PDF of the paper titled Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward, by Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto and Richard Torkar and Robert Feldt and Lucas Gren and Carlo A. Furia and Ziwei Huang
View PDF
Abstract:Software engineering research is evolving and papers are increasingly based on empirical data from a multitude of sources, using statistical tests to determine if and to what degree empirical evidence supports their hypotheses. To investigate the practices and trends of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering (ESE), this paper presents a review of a large pool of papers from top-ranked software engineering journals. First, we manually reviewed 161 papers and in the second phase of our method, we conducted a more extensive semi-automatic classification of papers spanning the years 2001--2015 and 5,196 papers. Results from both review steps was used to: i) identify and analyze the predominant practices in ESE (e.g., using t-test or ANOVA), as well as relevant trends in usage of specific statistical methods (e.g., nonparametric tests and effect size measures) and, ii) develop a conceptual model for a statistical analysis workflow with suggestions on how to apply different statistical methods as well as guidelines to avoid pitfalls. Lastly, we confirm existing claims that current ESE practices lack a standard to report practical significance of results. We illustrate how practical significance can be discussed in terms of both the statistical analysis and in the practitioner's context.
Comments: journal submission, 34 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1706.00933 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1706.00933v7 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.00933
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.002
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Richard Torkar [view email]
[v1] Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:50:18 UTC (165 KB)
[v2] Tue, 6 Jun 2017 08:16:49 UTC (165 KB)
[v3] Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:56:12 UTC (165 KB)
[v4] Wed, 2 May 2018 13:31:56 UTC (384 KB)
[v5] Sat, 20 Oct 2018 12:23:05 UTC (398 KB)
[v6] Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:52:56 UTC (2,093 KB)
[v7] Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:51:05 UTC (2,107 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward, by Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto and Richard Torkar and Robert Feldt and Lucas Gren and Carlo A. Furia and Ziwei Huang
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-06
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Richard Torkar
Robert Feldt
Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto
Lucas Gren
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences