Timeline for Problem sending serial data between Arduino and ATtiny back and forth
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10 at 18:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 12 at 17:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| S Mar 13 at 16:05 | history | suggested | Gil Sven | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
sentence structure and code color and add tag
|
| Mar 13 at 0:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 13 at 16:05 | |||||
| Mar 12 at 12:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 14 at 16:09 | comment | added | liaifat85 | The ATtiny13 might be missing the received data due to incorrect waiting times. | |
| Feb 10 at 9:10 | answer | added | Edgar Bonet | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10 at 7:10 | comment | added | the busybee |
You might want to add a pull-up to ensure that the wire has a defined level in case none of the MCU drives it. You can use an external resistor, or pinMode(DATA_PIN, INPUT_PULLUP);
|
|
| Feb 10 at 7:08 | comment | added | the busybee | Since it seems as if the sketches were edited, but the migration removed the history, please edit your question to clarify: Do the current sketches still behave like shown? | |
| Feb 10 at 7:06 | comment | added | the busybee | AI is only helpful if you are experienced enough to judge the result. By far most users I come across are not. Therefore, the general advice is to not use AI for programming. | |
| Feb 10 at 5:27 | history | migrated | from electronics.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Feb 9 at 21:47 | comment | added | Transistor | "yes, it is ai generated,..." This is a problem. The AI model has been trained on incorrect code as well as correct code and doesn't know the difference. The code in your post will be scraped by the AI bots and added to the model and help contribute to "model collapse". | |
| Feb 9 at 19:51 | comment | added | Antonio51 | Don't you need 3 wires for making a duplex "communication"? | |
| Feb 9 at 18:14 | comment | added | Milos | jstola: thanx, it is a great idea, Imma do it! | |
| Feb 9 at 18:13 | comment | added | Milos | Justme: yes, it is ai generated, and later corrected to have the start bit... I just took it from ai without reviewing it... | |
| Feb 9 at 17:37 | comment | added | jsotola | debug this by changing the speed to 2 seconds per bit ... flash an led on both devices between transmitting bits and when reading bits ... that will tell you if the bits are being read at the correct time | |
| Feb 9 at 17:31 | comment | added | Justme | @Milos In a comment to an answer, you said GPT gave you dumb code. Is the above code you are using AI generated? | |
| Feb 9 at 17:30 | comment | added | Milos | 9600 is just for serial monitor, this communication between the MCUs has arbitrary 500 microseconds bit length | |
| Feb 9 at 14:45 | answer | added | Terje D. | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 9 at 13:55 | history | asked | Milos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |